Greeks Vs. Romans

On a grand scale, which of the two nations had a better fighting force? If the Greek army at its peak fought the Roman army at its peak in even numbers who would win? It seems as though the Romans have the advantage of time, giving them better technology, but I havn't heard of too many Roman battles where the odds were so against the Romans and yet they still claimed victory, as was the case many times with the Greeks. Also, there are many more famous Roman generals than Greek generals. Was this because the focus was more on leading city states? History seems to "show off" perticular elements of a culture as that culture wrote it down, giving credit to different people.

Just something to ponder over

Democracy?

In Venezuela, the proposal to alter the constitution to allow unlimited presidential terms, limitless state of emergency time, among other things, was shot down by a 51 to 49% vote. However, only 56% of the registered voters turned out. This says something about the way the people live in the country. Alt4hough Chavez has almost limitless power in his country, even his legions of followers did not fully support this new change. Instead of voting against it however, many of them decided to stay home. Many stated that it was out of fear of retaliation that they did not vote. Has Chavez's power become so much that it threatens the democracy as a whole, even without changing the way their system works. If fear of retaliation led to 44% of the voters not voting whatsoever, what does this say about the way the democracy in this country works? Dispite this, there is something to be said of the somewhat change to Socialism in Venezuela, which ironically is using the democratic process to slowly change their country into one of socialism. Do these people even want democracy?